Many things still hold true today that were
true long ago. I’ve noticed this in several contexts, such as the
bible,(and, just for Dan) that’s a VERY old book, the way that men are
constantly trying to figure out new ways to rule the world (or gain power,) and
women are consistently concerned with… well, too many things to keep track
of. Many of us women read magazines, whether they be on “100 one minute
quick makeup tricks!” or “5 minute healthy recipes for a flat tummy” or even “What
does your guy really want?” Though, I think if you are actually looking for
answers in a magazine rather than just asking him, we have bigger issues to
deal with.
Women’s magazines for the most part have
stayed fairly the same over time, except for being polluted with articles about
sex, sex, and more sex since the sexual revolution that began in the
1960s. They could make entire magazines about that alone and keep it out
of my entertainment reading. But over all, women’s magazines concern themselves
with the nature of a woman: how to be captivating, and of course all of the
advertisements that will tell you what you need to buy in order to be just
that. This ranges from makeup, clothing, shoes, and cooking to
inspirational articles such as “What’s more important than that last 5 pounds”
and “How I survived ______.” And of course,
fashion at the core of most.
Let’s take a look at just one magazine. Vogue
is a long time running fashion and lifestyle magazine that was founded in 1892
as a weekly publication. Much has changed since; as of now it runs as a
monthly publication and has changed hands of editors many times, as well as
surviving WWII and the great depression. I went to the library, (yeah,
can you believe it? Isn’t the internet supposed to have it all? Hint: it
doesn’t) and cracked open a dusty binding containing a September edition of a
1923 Vogue. I was excited. But, to be honest, what I found didn’t
keep me on the edge of my seat, though it was interesting.
The magazine contained no bright images
jumping out to grab my attention (yes, I know, 1920s) and contained much more
text than a magazine today. Even many of the advertisements contained
large amounts of text. One for Elizabeth Arden had seven persuasive
paragraphs under a caption of “How Old Are You?” and preceded to explain that
your capillaries will dry up causing the skin to get “sallow and lifeless,” and
look aged if you do not use their “Muscle-strapping treatments” that “work
their miracles of rejuvenation.” The language in most of the articles was
beautifully written though, and reminded me of past shows I have acted in of
the time period. An advertisement for women’s perfume (on the right) reads, “Like A Corsage
of Costly Orchids, Fleurs d’ Amour (Flowers of Love) is a symbol of distinction
–The most luxurious perfume in the world.” What an elegantly phrased sales
pitch! Following the well-spoken advertisements, I read a quite wonderful
article: “Smartness Versus Prettiness: The Way Of Wearing One’s Clothes Being
More Important Than the Clothes One Wears, and One’s General Air and Manner
Being the Most Important of All.” That’s quite a lengthy title, but it
definitely gets across what I’m going to be reading about. The article starts
off with a simple example that sets up the rest of it up with a clear message
(as if the title was overlooked):
"A WOMAN may be as ugly as
she pleases (though, to do them justice, few women are) and yet be smart.
This attribute has almost nothing to do with beauty. We saw a cat the
other day which, when examined in detail, had little to recommend it. A
cat of very ordinary cat colour, which limped. Its tail had been reduced
to a stump either by act of God or the King’s enemies; moreover, it was going
to have kittens, which did not improve its figure. Yet that cat had an
air of distinction; it was a very Dutchess among cats. It moved along
sedately; aloof, scorning the outside world, holding itself superior to
everything it met, human or otherwise; and it compelled admiration. It
was as smart a cat as we ever saw.”
There we have it. Confidence is the
key to beauty. Even now, magazines will preach this message. Can I
wear bright blue eyeliner? Sure! IF I have the attitude to go with
it. How refreshing to look back 92 years ago and see that women back then
were all about the attitude more so than the clothing, though the affects of
“retail therapy” in my mind are still wonderful when funds allow such activities.
The important point the article makes is that “One may have the latest
fashioned clothes and be ill-dressed, and one may have clothes of no special
fashion and be extremely well-dressed… to carry oneself with a certain
confidence is an asset and makes for respectful commendation from on-lookers.”
Though now women’s magazines are as much
about the pictures as they are about the text, at least one thing holds true.
Fashion is about the style, but is even more about the way you wear it, and
that has been preached since the beginning of the magazine era.
Looks like while the length of articles and design of magazines have changed significantly over the last eighty years, much of the content remains the same. I just recently read an article in GQ magazine that showed a variety of fashions trending in the world today. At the end of the article though, it stated that no matter what fashion you follow, the key is to wear it with confidence. That concept seems to have lasted through the years and I imagine will continue to do so.
ReplyDelete